In Stern's piece, “Big - Fat Girl: A True Story,” by Moore (in Lunsford et al. 2009) Stern told that Moore neglects all ostensible experts because Moore considers that beauty, health, and nutrition don’t tell us we should strive to be. Moore’s piece on the relation of the overweight issue in our American society is poorly written. Moore, fat woman who was a fat girl and struggled with her self-esteem by her unfit family. She was raised by an unfit mother who gave her up to her maternal grandmother. Her father was overweight too and was out of picture after her mother shut him out Moore’s life. Moore was raised at her maternal grandmother’s farm in Arkansas and she served Judith very unhealthy food all her childhood. She used the rhetorical techniques by telling her personal experiences and messaging famous people who was overweight and America society accepted them. Also telling her own personal statements like “My flesh resists loss. My fat holds on for dear life, holds on under my bratwurst arms and between my clabber thighs.”
Moore’s other claim, the fat people cannot lose weight because they do have scarred personal experiences inside them. The people who treated the fat people badly, they gave the fat people holes, and the fat people eat hopefully to fill up their holes. This fashions the argument to be social. America’s society considers every woman should be skinny and glamorous. Which gave the fat people and Moore stress, it gave them more holes so they ate more to fill up. Moore claims her trustworthiness by telling her personal experiences about men using her, insulting her that she will break the dive board when she jumps into the swimming pool, and many more. Telling her personal experiences is a hardest thing to tell but she got the guts to but I believes that she do not have any other evidence to tell so she used her personal experiences instead. Also Moore presented the famous people who felt like her. Charles Laughton who was a Academy Award winning actor or Harold Bloom who is a American literary critic and who holds chairs at Yale University and New York University, they were overweight people and America accepted them because their natural talent. That is not fair with skinny famous people with no talent but they were famous because their beauty. Moore argues with this public issue today too.
I trust my feelin
gs about Moore, she told in the article that she was a fat person and couldn’t lose weight, I think that’s a fiction because it seemed that she do have some healthy problems such like she don’t have the right balance of metabolism. I consider that she spoke in her piece without her confidence in it. I believe that Moore used her technique of putting in a personal experience in her piece is an impact to the people. But unfortunately her cover and title do not make any effect to the public. If the public actually open the book and get under the cover, they will feel the huge effect from Moore by her personal horrors. But again, she presented all about her personal experiences and pointing at the famous overweight people. She didn’t support her statements from any doctors or specialists who specified in medical obesity. I respect her anger about her fatness but she do not have enough evidence to support that nobody can help with reducing their obesity. I do not feel determined in her because she only told about her personal experiences. She need to add more rhetorical techniques to capture me.
To feel the last blow of this piece, after Moore told about her personal experiences and she told some of her happiness that she got married twice and had children. She proved to us that a fat woman can be a human, reproduce babies who will always make the mother smile. And the audience of fat haters and bluntly media are the main target for Moore. I feel impressed with Judith Moore with her spilling personal experiences but she seems like she is really bitter with the America’s perspective of fatness. She may need to look the America society in other perspective because the people today were raised from the past, believing that fat is bad. She should give some proposals about changing the America’s perspective of overweight people.
Moore’s other claim, the fat people cannot lose weight because they do have scarred personal experiences inside them. The people who treated the fat people badly, they gave the fat people holes, and the fat people eat hopefully to fill up their holes. This fashions the argument to be social. America’s society considers every woman should be skinny and glamorous. Which gave the fat people and Moore stress, it gave them more holes so they ate more to fill up. Moore claims her trustworthiness by telling her personal experiences about men using her, insulting her that she will break the dive board when she jumps into the swimming pool, and many more. Telling her personal experiences is a hardest thing to tell but she got the guts to but I believes that she do not have any other evidence to tell so she used her personal experiences instead. Also Moore presented the famous people who felt like her. Charles Laughton who was a Academy Award winning actor or Harold Bloom who is a American literary critic and who holds chairs at Yale University and New York University, they were overweight people and America accepted them because their natural talent. That is not fair with skinny famous people with no talent but they were famous because their beauty. Moore argues with this public issue today too.
I trust my feelin
gs about Moore, she told in the article that she was a fat person and couldn’t lose weight, I think that’s a fiction because it seemed that she do have some healthy problems such like she don’t have the right balance of metabolism. I consider that she spoke in her piece without her confidence in it. I believe that Moore used her technique of putting in a personal experience in her piece is an impact to the people. But unfortunately her cover and title do not make any effect to the public. If the public actually open the book and get under the cover, they will feel the huge effect from Moore by her personal horrors. But again, she presented all about her personal experiences and pointing at the famous overweight people. She didn’t support her statements from any doctors or specialists who specified in medical obesity. I respect her anger about her fatness but she do not have enough evidence to support that nobody can help with reducing their obesity. I do not feel determined in her because she only told about her personal experiences. She need to add more rhetorical techniques to capture me.To feel the last blow of this piece, after Moore told about her personal experiences and she told some of her happiness that she got married twice and had children. She proved to us that a fat woman can be a human, reproduce babies who will always make the mother smile. And the audience of fat haters and bluntly media are the main target for Moore. I feel impressed with Judith Moore with her spilling personal experiences but she seems like she is really bitter with the America’s perspective of fatness. She may need to look the America society in other perspective because the people today were raised from the past, believing that fat is bad. She should give some proposals about changing the America’s perspective of overweight people.
No comments:
Post a Comment